Debunking the Flat Country/Bike Country myth
![Bikeland (by [Zakkaliciousness]) Bikeland (by [Zakkaliciousness])](http://static.flickr.com/167/414919854_6bf7336ccc.jpg)
[Nicked and revised freely from the EU paper – "Cycling – a way forward for cities and towns"... hey, our tax money paid for it...]
There's one thing we often hear at Copenhagenize.com - "Denmark and Holland only ride so much because the countries are flat..."
We're not trying to debunk the myth that the countries are flat. Compared to Andorra, they are. It's true. The geographical features of the two nations, and the two capitals have little to do with why so many people ride their bikes here.
It is actually a historical and political issue. When the Bicycle Revolution 1.0 swept the planet in the late 1800's and early 1900's everybody, everywhere in the industrialised world, rode a bike. The bicycle liberated women and it liberated the working class.
In Denmark and the Netherlands, there were Cyclist Unions just like anywhere else. When cycling became a sport - which happened quickly and with great impact - the cyclist unions in many countries then had to compete with Sport Cycling unions. In the Netherlands they saw the bicycle as a social activity for the people, with many societal benefits. They even banned bike racing for a time in order to preserve the bicycle as an integral part of the culture.
In Denmark, the cyclists' union was well-organised and politically active from the start and, throughout the 20th century it remained so. In both countries the unions were powerful and vocal advocates of bike culture and they were heard.
We reap the benefits to this day. So THAT is why we ride, not because the cities are flat.
To the hills!
If we're debunking flat myths, we simply must take a trip to Switzerland. The city of Basel is built on the steep banks of the Rhine and yet 23% of journies are made by bike.
And in Bern, where many roads have a gradient on the steep-o-meter of 7%, the percentage is 15%.
Not to mention Oslo, Stockholm, Gothenburg and Denmark's second city, Aarhus. All very hilly.
In reality, there are not many situations which prohibit the use of a bicycle. The only climatic features which have a really dissuasive influence on cyclists are pouring rain or blistering heat.
Appropriate clothing and a suitable infrastructure on arrival greatly reduce the negative impact of atmospheric conditions which are far less compatible with daily cycling than is imagined.
Hills are a not insignificant obstacles for somewhat untrained cyclists using old and unsuitable bicycles in towns where slopes with a more than 5 % gradient are long and numerous.
Even under such circumstances, there is a potential for cycling, as can be seen from the following hilly towns: Trondheim (Norway) has reached a cycling rate of 8 % and has equipped itself with the first bicycle lifts in the world.
As for the flat countries like the Netherlands and Denmark... people never mention the wind. Try riding to work in a storm, with hurricane strength gusts, in the middle of a dark January morning. The North Sea loves our flat countries and does everything it can to blow us off our bikes. In vain, we'd like to add.
WE'RE NOT ALONE
And while we're at it, let's get rid of the myth that it is only Copenhagen and Amsterdam that ride like the wind.
Let's face it. Bikes are used regularly almost everywhere in Europe. Mostly in Northern Europe, since in some parts southern Europe the bike is often regarded as a child's plaything or a piece of sports equipment.
So let's look at the oft overlooked cities and towns in Europe that enjoy a high level [compared to other regions] of bike usage.
In Parma, in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, 19% of all journeys are made by bike. By comparison, the city of Davis, in California, has a figure of 17%, one of the highest in the US.
And then there is Ferrara, Italy, about 50 km from Bologna. Here 31% of trips between home and work are biked.
Then there is the fine town of Västerås in central Sweden. Icy cold during the winters but still, 33% of journeys are by bike.
It rains quite often in Cambridge, UK. This doesn't discourage the inhabitants from making 27% of all journeys on two, manpowered wheels.
Many German cities enjoy bike culture, too. In Münster 30% of all trips are by bike. Now that Berlin and Paris, not to mention Barcelona and other cities, are investing in bike infrastructure, bike usage in Europe is on a rapid rise. Over 60 cities have bike sharing programmes and that number grows every quarter.
SIZE DOESN'T MATTER
Many North American cities are, indeed, urban sprawls but we often get people commenting on the fact that American cities are WAY too big to ride in compared to European cities.
Sure, if you choose to live in a distant suburb, you're in for a long commute, but there really isn't that much of a difference in size in cities of roughly the same population.
And if you really want to ride, you'll find a way.


18 comments:
Well said, with excellent examples. After seeing Dutch cycle tourists in Luxembourg (hardly a flat spot in the whole country) riding heavily laden omafietsen and not worrying about their lack of gears, I came to realize that it is the attitude and the motor that moves the bike forward, and that obstacles are there to be overcome. The Seattle area, where I ride, has many grades of up to 10%, sometimes miles long, as well as wind and rain. In spite of all this, I am far from the only one out there on two human powered wheels, and we continue to work to reach the level of truly bicycle freindly cities. Wish us luck! Val
A wonderful post. Thanks, Val! And you have our warmest wishes. Good luck!
Hey thanks for the article. In my experience it's more about the culture (especially supporting bicycles as a means of transportation) than the geography. I recently moved from San Francisco to Maine (yeah, I ask myself, "Why?" often). San Francisco has one of the most lively bicycle cultures in the U.S. - and yep, some of the biggest hills of any U.S. city. Getting around by bicycle here in Maine is usually a nerve-wracking experience. The lack of an infrastructure (country roads with increasing car and truck (thanks to Poland Spring Water) traffic) combined with automobile drivers who don't think I should even be on the road is helping to age me prematurely. But I sure am liking the rise in the cost of gasoline.
Thanks for giving us insight into your experiences, buck. Indeed, San Francisco is an excellent example of how bike culture can exist in a vertical world.
You'd think Maine and that area was a little more advanced in regards to bike friendly infrastructure.
It's refreshing to read a positive spin on hilly biking terrain. As a cyclist in Seattle I often hear potential cyclists moaning about the hills. I, for one, think hills can be embraced by cyclists and as said by others in this post, it is really the attitude towards cycling that counts. You don't have to be a road jock to ride up hills. Two shouts for the granny gear!
thanks for the comment!
hills are no hindrance to urban cycling.
if you want to ride bad enough, you'll muscle it up that hill.
:-)
After you get a decent PEDELEC starting at 700 € there are no excuses even if you have a hilly terrain..
Electric bikes just don't fly here. I have a mate who is developing a bespoke model and there are no plans for selling it in Scandinavia.
Unless you are elderly, you WILL be mocked...:-)
If you can't muscle your way up a 7% grade on a three speed, clunky old bike, then you aren't Danish.
It definitely is the attitude, and perhaps the type of bike. After not riding a number of years and trying mountain bike, I couldn't even balance.They would be a definite asset in mountains for the coordinated!
Georgia Jenkins - check my blog re. dogs and business
I completely agree with your post. If there is a bicycle infrastructure, people WILL ride more, no matter where. I live in a town just north of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and work 30km. away in another town. The only direct route is one very congested road with no shoulders to speak of. I’ve cycled to work a few times, but it’s just not worth my life to do so, so I gave up and sit alone in my car every day, churning out pollution. There’s no public transit either. Very North American!! LOL! The governments are very short term in their outlook when it comes to urban planning here. By the way, I can attest to the winds in and around Holland. Some years ago I was cycling from Holland through Belgium to the Atlantic coast, and the wind was so brutal that at one point it was all I could do to inch forward using all my strength!! I’ve also cycled through Switzerland. I was amazed at their cycling infrastructure, but while cycling towards Bern from Basel I got lost and ended up pushing my fully loaded bike over a rocky mountain path. Well, it was a mountain to me, but probably in reality it was just a Swiss hill :)
Cheers!
thanks for the comments! great to hear your points of view.
I'd like to translate this post to Portuguese, to post in my blog Tota Urbs Vincit. May I do it?
sure. just send a link when it's up.
I translated the text and posted at
http://totaurbs.blogspot.com/2009/03/sao-paulo-nao-e-uma-cidade-plana-e-dai.html
Thank you!
I do agree that flatness cannot be a sufficient reason by itself, but it certainly helps. When it's really hilly, many people don't even want to try cycling around. And actually, Basel and Bern are considered flat to the swiss standards ;-)
Living on a city built on three hills makes cycling harder, many people from Lausanne don't want to bike because they think it's going to be too hard. One can actually avoid the steepest roads and adapt their itinary http://www.lausanne.ch/view.asp?domId=63517&Language=E and the bicycle association edited a map a few years back with all the cycle-friendly, not so steep itinaries.
The city of Lausanne is also doing something smart. It partly subsidises electric bikes and over 500 electric bikes have been bought like this. We see more of those and, even tough I'm not an electric bikes fan myself, I do agree it may be a good alternative for many.
Another good think is a "free loan" bicycle service now open all year round. And there's a "bike to work" event every June country wide so encourage people trying and maybe stick to it afterwards.
You'd think everyone would bike? Not quite...
You mention Basel and Bern... This actually support your argument: swiss german are culturally more encline to using their bikes, many drivers are also cyclists and it makes riding in swiss german cities generally much nicer because people are civil to each other. Most drivers around here consider that bicycles should not be on the roads, period, and many give us a hard time. I really wish we'll reach the critical amount of bikes in town, so that the space devoted to us doesn't get wheeled on constantly. Plus it's proved the cycling get safer and safer the more cyclists ther is.
Spring/Summer's better, most people bike, I've found myself waiting at the red light with 2 or 3 other bikes lately, yeah!
(My last sentence "most people bike" is an error, maybe a form of wishful thinking, I meant "more people bike".)
Some more numbers on Århus, Denmark: 20% of journeys are done by bike. To get from the harbour to the ring road, you cycle three kilometres at a 3% grade.
http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Århus#Trafik
Why would I be mocked in Denmark if I rode an E bike?
Once people who needed gears were mocked too. We'd think that very strange today. Skiers use tows to get up mountains. Should they be mocked also?
The Dutch, who know almost as much about bikes as the Danes, bought 126,000 E bikes last year and sales are heading for 180,000 E bikes this year. What does that come to? About 500 for each bike shop in the land?
Perhaps it's just old Dutch folks buying them. But a Gazelle E bike, The Innergy, won Bike of the Year this year, and that honor a win against all types of bikes, impresses all ages.
It also impresses me that Gazelle, which has been making great bikes for 116 years, has very cautiously and soberly gone into this new field.
I'm especially interested in E bikes not just because I have one, not just because I'm old, unfortunately, but because I think they might be the secret weapon we need to get my fellow Australians commuting on bikes.
The situation is very serious here. The patient is very ill. Our bike commute rate is .8%. Is there anywhere else in the developed work were the vital signs are weaker?
How will the E bike help? Well, the usual excuses for not riding are our distances, our hills, and our hostile traffic. I claim the E bike takes care of all three.
The first two, you understand but hostile motorists, how can the E bike help with those, you ask?
Well, right now no one in this country sits up straight on a bike. Everyone rides helmeted and hunched over, like they are grumbling at the world.
Such riders make no eye contact with drivers. They don't see well and are not seen well.
On an E bike, it's so easy to be different, to do what European riders do so naturally, sit up tall, smile, enjoy the scenery, hold a lover's hand.
Up straight makes for a less annoying cyclist and the E bike, headwind neutral, helps one be that way.
No one here gets this except me, and when I broach these theories, I'm consided mad.
But then this is a country where if you go into a bike shop asking for a commuter bike because you'd like to ride to work....
... the guy will show you a bunch of bikes with flat bars, no mudguards, no bike racks, no lights, no chain guard, a narrow seat, and that a commuter bike in local opinion
He even has the your ride to work clothes ready too, your spandex, your lycra, the curvy helmet, the lot.
So, you see the situation is already bizarre and in this context, my thinking is rather sane when I say we need a shock machine to scramble brains.
Here, you see me putting theory to the test as I accost a typical hunched over cyclist, and offer him something very different. Mike Rubbo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjDNfU_XdNs
Post a Comment