In addition, I just watched this interesting PBS show about commuting and petrol prices. I couldn't embed it, so click on through to see it.
28 Reasons To Ride your Bicycle
1. Increase in local property values.
2. Correlation with Overall Wealth.
The notion that more cars equals more wealth is really more myth than reality. In fact, some new research shows that high and increasing levels of car dependence actually harms an economy. In a report to the World Bank, researchers from the Institute for Science and Technology Policy (ISTP) in Perth, Australia showed that there are "diseconomies" associated with car use. Auto dependence can drain an economy of its wealth….3. Less Public Money Is Needed To Create a High Quality Transportation System.
It found that, among cities in the developed world, regional wealth (as measured by per capita gross regional product - or GRP) actually goes down as car use go up. In other words, the more we drive, the poorer we get....
The global comparison is ... illuminating. Cities such as Zurich,
Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Tokyo and Paris all have a much higher use of public transport than any American, Canadian or Australian city. Yet they build fewer roads and own fewer cars. They have much higher bike use. They have roughly half the transportation deaths. They spend less on getting to work. They emit a fraction of the CO2.
And, oh yes, they're richer.
Europe's 11 principal cities average 390 cars per 1000 people and have an average GRP of US$32,000 per capita. Meanwhile, the USA's 10 principal cities average 600 cars per 1000 people with a GRP of only $27,000. Tokyo's average car ownership is a paltry 225 while its GRP soars at $37,000.
More spending on cars does not create wealth. It just transfers money
elsewhere. Often that elsewhere is outside your local economy. Last time I checked, my home town didn't have an oil or car industry. And buying Ford and GM seems isn't making Detroit, MotorCity USA, any richer. Excessive spending on cars and their infrastructure merely means less money in your pocket and your economy that can be used for productive things.
4. High-Tech Business Is Attracted by a Perceived Better Quality of Life
5. Improved Personal Finances
6. Better Physical Health
7. Better Mental and Emotional Health
8. Fewer Overweight and Obese Citizens
9. More Free Time
10. More Beauty
11. Greater Mobility
12. Inclusion of Senior Citizens
13. More Equitable Living for Low Income Earners
14. Increased Sense of Community
15. Individual Opportunities for Safer Travel
16. Less Congested Roads
17. Safer, Quieter Neighborhoods
18. More Resources for Public Use
19. Enhanced and More Credible Metropolitan Image
20. Better Air Quality
21. Visually More Appealing Metropolitan Area
22. Cleaner Surface and Ground Water
23. Quieter City
24. Slowed Pace of Global Warming
25. More Sustainable Lifestyle
Paths will help not only by reducing the need for the vast infrastructure needed to support automobile travel and by reducing emissions, but also by saving on the manufacture and disposal of autos. The Environment and Forecasting Institute in Heidelburg, Germany lists the following environmental costs of one car:26. Recognition for Leadership in Sound Environmental Policy
Extracting raw material:
26.5 tons of waste
922 million cubic meters of polluted air
Transporting raw material:
12 liters of crude oil in the ocean for each car
425 million cubic meters of polluted air
Producing the car:
1.5 tons of waste
75 million cubic meters of polluted air
Driving the car:
18.4 kilos of abrasive waste
1000 cubic meters of polluted air
Disposing of the car:
102 cubic meters of polluted air
27. Readiness for Other Environmental Initiatives
28. Enhanced Quality of Life for Women
20 thinking out louds:
Alll eminently sane, and mostly quantifiable, which means politicians must be either very badly informed ot simply ignoring the facts when they refuse to increas cycling infrastructure...
All that earnest stuff... They missed out that it's FUN...
bloody academics... :-)
Please allow me to point out that the German city is called Heidelberg (Berg = mountain), not Heidelburg.
Great list, and I'm with you on this - all these good-and-worthy reasons for riding are spot on. But the fun factor is what keeps people riding.
My car's due for it's annual safety checks in a couple of weeks (MoT test), and I've a feeling that it's going to fail with an expensive repair required. An now psyching myself up to tell Wife that it's beyond economic repair, and we don't really need to replace it . . .
Too true, too obvious. But we're too busy in Bailout Nation with other problems to do what's right.
Please send cash, not rational ideas. Thanks,
Jack
Hmmm, I'm sure Item 28 took quite a bit of research, didn't it, Mikael? ;-)
I'm kind of curious why enhanced quality of life is just for women? :)
I feel like my quality of life has been enhanced by riding a bike regularly, and I'm definitely not a woman :)
I agree, the fun factor clinches it - just the enjoyment of cruising through the city and looking around at everything is enough :)
Awww pffftttt! Poor academics! They DID say it is fun - just in a more all-encompassing way:
7. Better Mental and Emotional Health
So there! (From a bloody academic, colon dash right parenthesis)
haha, touché!
Workbike: The reasons why the politicians look the other way is that most of them are in the thrall of the very powerful road and oil lobby. 75% of the UK population are virtually car-dependent so I guess promoting cycling is seen as a vote loser. Politicians are only interested in two things. Getting into power. And staying in power. Nothing else really matters to them. And the few that I've met don't come across as particularly bright.
Probably the most recent comment made by a British politician that I came close to taking any notice off came from the Mayor of London who said that "...cycling is simply the most glorious way of getting about...".
About right, I'd say.
How do cycling countries deal with perineal damage caused by bike seats (such as covered in this paper: Vicious Cycling)
Are all Danes impotent? Are the seats different?
Anyway, it's interesting to compare these claims with those of the anti bike culture community, who claim that Copenhagen is a dull and expensive place to live, where everyone lives in tiny flats, pays far to much on rent, and can't afford to store anything. Zak, have you lived in other countries (perhaps an autocentric place like Houston) and can talk a bit to this?
njh... shouldn't you write "alleged damage"...? I'm well aware of these claims but there are few who take them very seriously. There isn't sufficient science to back up the claims. The risks of impotence from smoking and drinking and a sedentary lifestyle are far more serious.
I recall reading somewhere that racing saddles, with those super thin noses are more 'dangerous' than the type of saddle that most people use around the world.
It's another attempt to sell 'gear' and brand cycling as 'vicious and dangerous'.
Seriously... think of the millions that ride every day around the world in Europe and Japan and the rest of Asia.
You'd think that there would have been some sign by now, after decades of use, that the issue was serious.
You still have doctors in nations without strong bike culture telling women that cycling whilst pregnant is dangerous. In Europe, it is virtually a prescription.
Regarding the claims about Copenhagen... hmm. I doubt such doubters have ever travelled very widely.
i have lived in Canada, US, Australia, UK, France, Hong Kong, Taipei in my life. Many auto-centric places.
The claims about copenhagen are silly. As I constantly point out, there are 100 million daily cyclists in the EU. They live in every country, in every terrain, in every weather condition.
Then you have Japan. All of the above are wealthy countries with high standards of living - just look at the stats in this post about wages. We could buy a car if we wanted one. Most of my friends have cars - but ride their bikes each day - but we don't actually need one.
Whether Copenhagen is dull is a question of personal taste. It's not expensive if you live and work here, only if you travel here from outside of the EU with weak currency.
'can't afford to store anything?'
'tiny flats'?
Odd claims. I don't even know what the first one means. Everyone I know owns their flat or house. Tiny? Everything is relative. Square footage is not a valid yardstick for quality of life.
We've been the 'happiest nation on earth' for years. :-)
Sorry, yes, alleged. Anyway, that paper I linked was in a european urology journal, by people who appeared to have done a reasonable experiement. Perhaps it just isn't something people don't talk about? (Danes prudish, ha!) The end of the paper does include an editorial basically saying 'perhaps you are right, but being fat is worse'.
re quaint (= small and uncomfortable) copenhagen complainers, I think it is possible that the people in question looked a bunch of pictures, used the CIA factbook (which is a classic example of subtle bias/propaganda - which country has the most runways? which country has the most cheques in circulation? which country has the highest spending on health?) and developed their conclusion to match their beliefs.
However, when carefully constructed (or more likely, merely surviving enough uncritical thinking to continue to reproduce in the blogosphere) these memes float around and need careful debunking; lest they become 'common sense' and stop good projects.
"'can't afford to store anything?'
'tiny flats'?
Odd claims. I don't even know what the first one means. Everyone I know owns their flat or house. Tiny? Everything is relative. Square footage is not a valid yardstick for quality of life."
Ah, but it is to americans. You see, to a vocal group here it is amazingly wonderful that you can buy a pack of 100 toilet paper rolls saving 20c by driving to a warehouse 20 miles up the interstate. You need space to store all this stuff. I know people considered socialist by american standards who still buy into this idea and live in 300m^2 houses by themselves.
"Whether Copenhagen is dull is a question of personal taste. "
Having lived in the US for a few years now I can say that it is in fact a dull place to live but interspersed with interesting people. Given a choice between living in yet another 70s suburban house or in a terrace house in the middle of town, I know which I prefer. One only has to look at what americans think is an exciting holiday (disneyland, NYC, SF) to realise just how much they miss walkable environments.
Re happiest nation in the world: Ah, so the Danes are a bunch of pessimists :)
Fascinating discussion!
Yes, if you're buying a pallet-load of toilet paper you need a cubic metre of space back home to store it.... But if you're buying a four-pack you just tuck away under the sink or at the back of some shelf - and you can carry them home on foot or bike. Why not let the wholesalers do the storing?
My old Dad lives in Kelowna BC Canada and is bucking the BIG trend. He just moved into a freestanding guest house, about 35 square metres (377 sq ft) with a bed in one end of the living room. He loves the simplicity and low maintenance. This is a guy in his mid-70s who lived through the whole big suburban home thing of the 1970s. He's no greenie either - on the contrary, but somehow common sense has prevailed...
Apart from the cosy little place, the landlord who lives in the main house is a cool guy in his 80s, an ex-carpenter with a workshop, and they have become friends, taking care of various little jobs around the property. Work an hour, then head inside for tea and home-made cookies. Heaven!
So, the living quarters are tiny, but he's got a good thing going, and out the window, right across the local road he has lake views where he can watch the coots dive for food, check out how the weather's going, and watch sunsets every day.
Now there's a good news story for you!
Buckin' the BIG trend. I told him the other day, 'Man, you're LIVIN' THE DREAM!'
PS Now I just have to get him on a bike!
Cheers,
M.
Its a good list but to be honest I think those benefits will only be realised when there is a critical mass of cyclists on the road, something, that at least where I am, is not happening.
I love the toilet paper analogy. I always say that in 95% of America you MUST get into your car to go buy toilet paper before you can even take a crap and wipe your arse. Talk about total control!
Also, I do wonder about those penile impotency claims. Yes if you ride a racing bike with a tiny saddle in a very aggressive tuck position, you will get some pressure in perineal region; less if you are a skinny roady. But if you sit in an upright position with a more normal sized saddle, as on a European City Bike, much if this problem is eliminated. Plus if you ride for less than a half hour at a time the problem is probably nonexistent.
Anyway Mikael, thanks again for finding this. I love your blog because you are always coming across gems like these. This is a great resource for us over in the States when advocating for more bicycle infrastructure so I covered it on our bicycle advocacy blog here in New Jersey (http://walkbikejersey.blogspot.com/).
Sorry still learning my HTML.
Thanks Again!
Great information. Love this list. Thank you for sharing.
You forgot one - Its far more ok to ride a bike drunk!
Post a Comment