Driving Kills - Health Warnings

I think it's safe to say that we have a pressing need for marketing cycling positively if we're to encourage people to ride bicycles and begin the transformation of our cities into more liveable places.
Instead of scare campaigns about cycling [a life-extending, healthy, sustainable transport form], wouldn't it be more appropriate to begin campaigns about the dangers of automobiles? Many people in car-centric countries no longer regard the automobile as dangerous. Maybe they realise it, but the car is such an ingrained part of our culture that the perception of danger rarely rises to the surface of peoples consciousness. Sure, there are scare campaigns for cars out there, but what if we just cut to the chase.
Much like smoking. Only a couple of decades ago cigarettes were an integral part of life, whether you smoked or not. That has changed radically. I am certainly not comparing the dangers of smoking to the dangers of driving, I just think that we could borrow freely from the health warnings now found on cigarette packs around the world. 
Removing the status associated with driving is something that is slowly evolving. Speeding that process might be a good idea. We don't even have to mention bicycles, because it's not all about that. It's about reducing traffic accidents, harmful emissions and noise pollution.
On Tom Vanderbilt's blog How We Drive we can read:
"The world’s death toll from swine flu? 87 (according to the CDC) The number of global road fatalities, using WHO’s annual figure of 1.2 million, since the swine flu outbreak was first detected (using a very rough benchmark of a month ago)? 98,630."
In Denmark, 4000 people die every year because of the health hazards related to cars - and that's ten times greater than the number of people actually killed in car accidents. Respiratory illnesses, heart disease, stress-related illnesses caused by noise pollution, etc.
Very few people are aware that the levels of dangerous microparticles from exhaust are actually higher INSIDE the car than if you're cycling next to it. So let's focus on this fact and hopefully encourage motorists to think twice about their actions.
Shouldn't we have rules dictating that all advertisments for automobiles must have clearly visible warning labels? There are a variety of smoking texts that can be applied to the car health warnings.
Car emissions cause emphysema / Driving causes cancer / Driving clogs your arteries / Don't transport your children by car / Driving - A leading cause of death / Quitting will improve your health / Driving harms unborn babies / Driving is addictive / Car emissions are toxic /
And so on. Wikipedia has a comprehensive list.
The rules dictating health warnings on cigarettes packs usually involve reserving 30% of the surface for the warning. If we have health warnings on car advertisments then we should certainly have to have health warnings on the product itself. Imagine carmakers having to plaster 30% of the surface of each side of the car with health warnings. On the sides of trucks, the message would be massive.
Imagine the impact it would make on the public psyche.
If we think practically about implementing this idea, certain clauses would be necessary. Electric cars would not need to be plastered with the "Dangerous emissions" warnings, just the ones about how driving kills, etc.
In the first phase car owners would be able to purchase large stickers with heavy duty adhesive and in various sizes depending on their vehicle. Using reflective material so the warnings are visible at night would be a good idea. A little cottage industry would pop up, with companies offering to stick the warnings on, while you wait. Consumers could choose from a list of approved warnings instead of just being stuck with whatever they're given.
In time, carmakers could implement the warning labels directly into the design and paint job of the car, as long as they adhere to the directive's requirements for size and font.
Public transport companies would benefit and they could propose targeted warnings that would benefit trains, busses and even bicycles. This BMW advert, above, is a fine example of how bicycle shops could enjoy increased sales.
If there is a fee involved with purchasing the stickers for your car - which their should be - the proceeds could go to planting trees in cities, to charities dealing with obese children or illnesses caused by car pollution.
A good idea whose time has come. Coupled with mandatory motoring helmet laws, we'll well on our way to the demotorization of our cities.






33 thinking out louds:
In france you are now required to have a hi-viz vest in your car. If you were actually required to wear it while driving, it would ruin all attempts to look cool in a car.
Love it, Mikael!
A great idea, albeit one that could never happen. Could it?
In the UK we could never even bring in the EU Fifth Motoring directive.
Subject
Invitation: TH!NK2: Climate Change blogging contest
Dear Blogger,
The European Journalism Centre (EJC) would like to invite you to apply for the second round of the acclaimed blogging competition, TH!NK ABOUT IT. We have seen your blog and consider you an ideal candidate for the competition, TH!NK2: Climate Change.
TH!NK2 will bring together 81 bloggers from Europe with guests from India, China, Brazil and the US, to exchange ideas and debate the issues of the International Climate Summit in Copenhagen, in December 2009. The blogging competition will run from September 23 to December 20 and will begin with a launch event in Copenhagen in September. During their free trip to Copenhagen, participants will meet each other, receive some training and equipment and learn about the hottest topics in climate change.
If you are selected to come to Copenhagen in September you will receive a Flip Mino HD Camera. You will also have the opportunity to win many other prizes throughout the competition.
As a participant, you are encouraged to blog about climate change related topics in your own back yard; to bring out the local side of a global issue.
To participate in the competition, please go to www.thinkaboutit.eu, where you can read more about TH!NK2 and fill out the application form and attach a current resume/CV as well as a letter of motivation (250 words max).
You are receiving this invitation because the EJC has sought you out specifically as a target blogger.
The EJC is a non-profit, independent media development organisation.
Best regards,
Rina Tsubaki
could it happen?
common sense has never been easy to implement.
the car industry is powerful and they would certainly fight it.
but all it ever takes is one visionary politician to push things through.
Great idea!
Great, I absolutely love it. Actually people here in Austria once had a similar idea -- they printed such warnings on A4 and sticked them under peoples' windshields.
so, anna, what you're saying is that Austrians are stealing my fabulous ideas even BEFORE I invent them?! Shocking. :-)
In the U.S., for the first time, diseases related to obesity and sedentary lifestyles have caused more deaths than smoking-related diseases. Granted, there is some overlap, and obviously other non-car-related causes, however, it's becoming increasingly obvious that the U.S. in general needs to wake up and start moving around on their own power.
I remember one particular smoking ad that I used to see a few years back, with a drooping cigarette, and the headline "Smoking causes impotence." :)
We could definitely make some good adverts about the detriments of excessive car usage. Here especially though, I have a feeling it's going to be a long time before the posting of such ads is anything but an underground effort.
Hey Mikael:
Demotorization could be helped very much by new policies on the part of those automotive enablers: the Mainstream Media.
Here's a little statistic from Tom Vanderbilt's blog HOW WE DRIVE:
"The world’s death toll from swine flu? 87 (according to the CDC) The number of global road fatalities, using WHO’s annual figure of 1.2 million, since the swine flu outbreak was first detected (using a very rough benchmark of a month ago)? 98,630."
Imagine a national newscast that summed up the week by mentioning: "And this week, the number of automobile-related deaths worldwide - men, women, and children - totalled 5,887...."
Most Americans I talk to simply don't believe the regular annual death toll on our highways (currently running over 42,000 in the US).
Their logic seems to be: if it was that big a problem, the news would report it.
Keep up the good work.
... Nate (SLC)
Don't exempt electric cars from your clever concept! Right now in many places "plug in hybrids" get recharged from home current, which means they avoid all the high taxes for benzine, Diesel or gas, and pay even way less than what would be their fare share of fees for using the roads.
Also, the source of the electricity matters a lot.
Hi,
I love this post. It makes me realise I'm not alone. I have been reading about the history of cigarettes and the advocacy that went into banning advertising, introducing social marketing etc. and I think that it is possible.
Great ideas.
You're right, most people (especially in the United States) don't see the entire impact of an automobile dependent society. I've been wondering if it a societal disease, an addiction.
You could take it a step further and put photos of collisions and obese people on adverts and other promotional items. I remember seeing grotesque photos pasted on cigarette boxes in Australia.
I just read in Autophobia (http://books.google.com/books?id=NV5IRPwGBgUC&printsec=frontcover) that 30 million people have died since the automobile was invented (don't remember the page number).
Gorgeous! Completely and utterly gorgeous!
BIG GRIN! :-)
Love it, forwarding it on to many people now...
ps my verification word is "cancereg" - seems appropriate.
Another thought: warning labels may reduce hooning too. A 'hoon' is an Aussie term for an idiot younger driver, who thinks it's cool to do things like drag race down the street, make their tyres squeal as they accelerate away, and scare the bejesus out of cyclists by swerving into us at speed, often throwing empty beer bottles. More on Wikipedia.
They of course have to have a car that they think looks cool - I'm sure you can all imagine the type of thing that would appeal - and warning labels would definitely not be cool...
OK. That girl in the BMW ad is, maybe, 12! Gross! Does this ad mean that driving a BMW will turn you into a creepy pedophile? That might work to turn people off the product.
great comments.
the BMW ad was pulled because of complaints. oooh. quelle surpris alors.
Cars have long had messages, often political, on their rear ends. Bumper stickers. What about a panel at the back of a bike for a racker sticker?
I'll never forget the sticker which said; kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray. So that becomes, kissing a driver is like licking up sump oil. Mike Rubbo
I love these poster mockups!! Good work, very funny! :-D
Annon 18:00 said- I'll never forget the sticker which said; kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray. So that becomes, kissing a driver is like licking up sump oil
I say- Kissing a driver is like sucking a siphon hose (although, I hate to say so as my husband is driving home from work as I type this and he is most certainly NOT like kissing a siphon hose! )
OMG. If I would find that these messages would be pushed on me this way - as an official attitude that I'd need to adopt - I'm telling you that I'd directly cancel my next bike building project and would immediately, with a high degree of awareness, redirect my spendings on taking a driving license. Although I don't really like the cars around me and can do very well without one it is an option I'd like to keep.
Fantastic idea: We need to break through the lie that cars are safe.
Hey Mikael
maybe I'm just naïve, but personally I don't think it's a good idea to start a campaign against cars. Sure, you're pointing out the dangers, but in essence this is a negative campaign.
Bond Beter Leefmilieu, where I work, has released press releases against all things cars on numerous occassions.
Consequence is that you get the entire car loving community on your back. And instead of creating sympathy for bicycles, you only harvest hate against yourself - and by consequence everything you stand for, hence also against bicycle culture.
So yeah, I a understand Just A cyclist in his comment.
now this idea isn't one to be brought upon by society by cycling groups - THAT would cause animosity.
The idea is that governments implement the warnings, like they have done with cigarettes.
No mention of bicycles or public transport, just pure public awareness that cars kill, in a variety of ways.
Aha, I missed that point.
In that case I would suggest to narrowing it down to city centres.
Just like you have the whole controversy - here anyways - about smoking in bars and/or restaurants.
I think too many people still have no choice but to depend on their cars for long distance trasnportation.
I postulated this years ago in a post in my old blog in which I analized a car ad and the subtle push in it towards bicycle segregation:
great minds think alike.
BUllshit^^
Bullshit meaning what? That cars don't kill? Don't pollute?
Hi,
If You Have A Passion For Driving And You Want To Know The Best Tips Of Driving(Cars, Bikes, Cycles, Cruises, Planes n Many More..), Start Driving With Us....
Visit Us At --
http://www.driving-information.com/
Race Is Going On For Racers...
Think in terms of behaviors. You control your own safety. Your car doesn't care whether you live or die. Neither does your bicycle. Neither the car nor the bike cares whether you take down a pedestrian.
So rather than fight a losing battle to make car drivers feel some sort of diffuse guilt (thanks, I already have a mother in law!), why not remind everyone -- motorist, cyclist, pedestrian, whatever -- to watch out for both his own safety and that of others.
Civility. It's the only long-term solution.
According to a survey released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, fewer Americans are drinking and driving, but one in six drivers are driving while on drugs during the weekend. The data was released on Monday from a survey conducted in 2007....
http://www.IdiotsTrafficSchool.com http://www.FreeTryTrafficSchool.com http://www.DummiesTrafficSchool.com
[I am obviously answering to a very old comment but unfortunately i can only see the time, not the date of comments.]
Between this 1.5 spams before me, Anonymous says "why not remind everyone -- motorist, cyclist, pedestrian, whatever -- to watch out for both his own safety and that of others."
So how fair it is to give 80% of public space in most developed cities to a very inefficient way of transport, and then try to be egalitarian and then say to cyclists, whatever, to watch out for "his own safety"?
It is much more reasonable, in fact, to have a legal system (like in some countries) where the weaker road user (pedestrian, then cyclist, then car and finally heavy goods vehicles) is always right.
We are not equal, after all! Some take up more space, some pollute more, some are more dangerous. Sorry.
Post a Comment